Skip to content

TaiwanAirBlog

since 2006

Menu
  • About
Menu

A Mystery Solved, I Think…

Posted on February 13, 2006

Though it was not unexpected, I was disappointed that Hsinsher Open House yesterday did not have any flight demo.  Luckily, I had an chance to get a very close look at UH-1H 424, a helicopter that seemed mysterious to me, until yesterday.

It is well known that AIDC license-built 118 UH-1H from 1969 to 1976 (or 1977), their serial numbers from 301 to 418.  But last year I saw UH-1H 424 at one of the open houses.  So what is the deal?  A little research showed that ROCA received seven UH-1H from ROCAF in 1985/1986.  So 424 could be one of the seven.  But I need more proof.

 

UH-1H 386 and 424

 

At Hsinsher yesterday, UH-1H 386 (64-2086) and 424 (69-2124) were on display.  One would think that 424 is the newer of the two.  But is it?  The aircraft identification plate of 424 shows that its original serial number is 69-16678, confirming that it is one of the nine UH-1H acquired by ROCAF in 1970 and one of the seven transferred to ROCA.  So it is in fact older than 386.

 

Identification plate of UH-1H 424

 

But wasn’t 386 built in 1964 given its serial number 64-2086?  Because it was built by AIDC, 64 does not mean “the year of 1964”, but “the 64th year of the Republic”, which is equivalent to 1975.  (To get 1975, simply add 1911 to 64.)  Its identification plate says that its Bell serial number is 18086, which comes after 424’s Bell serial number 17024.

 

Identification plate of UH-1H 386

 

Well, a mystery solved, I think…  But the crew present were not interested in my discovery.  I told them that, unlike 386, 424 was the original Bell work.  Their response was that both helicopters had been overhauled by Air Asia.  I bet they had no idea what I was talking about…

And there is more.  Although many military publications are correct in saying that the Hueys previously used by ROCAF for SAR missions were built by Bell, they claim these helicopters are HH-1H.  Now you know they are wrong!

Share on Social Media
x facebook tumblr reddit
Post Views: 271

2 thoughts on “A Mystery Solved, I Think…”

  1. JP says:
    April 25, 2006 at 10:51 pm

    我有次去龍潭採訪看到424
    機尾還是漆美軍序號
    後來又看到424
    已經改成陸軍所獨自創獲的中西合璧式的怪序號
    還好有我們這些喜愛研究飛機號碼甚於樂透號碼的人
    真相才有機會大白

  2. Administrator says:
    April 26, 2006 at 10:07 am

    真希望研究飛機序號也可以中大獎!

Comments are closed.

Recent Posts

  • 孤證不立
  • 相關性不等於因果關係
  • 免於戰犯審判的分所長
  • 人非聖賢
  • 一次無功而返的任務

Recent Comments

  1. Administrator on 大膽假設,小心求證
  2. ZY on 大膽假設,小心求證
  3. Kenneth R Becht on Shu Lin Kou Air Station (Updated)
  4. Administrator on 中情局對黑貓中隊飛行員的死亡撫卹金
  5. Brian on 中情局對黑貓中隊飛行員的死亡撫卹金

Archives

35th Sq. B-24 B-25 B-29 Bombing Formosa CIA CORONA Google Hsichun Mike Hua KH-4A KH-4B POW TACKLE Takao Task Force 38 TBM Tom Wang U-2 中央情報局 中情局 卓蘭 嘉義 屏東 張立義 快刀計畫 戰俘 戰俘營 新竹 日月潭 日治時期機場 李南屏 楊世駒 王濤 空襲台灣 第22轟炸大隊 第38特遣艦隊 第38轟炸大隊 第43轟炸大隊 臺灣俘虜收容所 華錫鈞 陳懷 飛行場 高雄 黃七賢 黑貓中隊

©2026 TaiwanAirBlog | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme